<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/">
<title>The Flogging (Flood's Blog)</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/</link>
<description>Expostulations by Anthony Flood</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:date>2007-01-25T03:01+00:00</dc:date>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1169696345.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1162484349.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1155140667.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153690262.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153689565.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153688397.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1142700034.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1138373608.shtml" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1169696345.shtml">
<title>The Big Lie That's Pepping Up the Cattle for An Assault on Iran</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1169696345.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Anthony Flood</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-01-25T03:01+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
You know, the one about "wiping Israel off the map."  (As in "The President of Iran has repeatedly vowed to . . . ")  Innocent of any knowledge of Farsi, the best I could do at the time was discuss another example of <a href="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1138373608.shtml">map-wiping as a goal.</a>  <br />
<br />
Finally, however, someone without my linguistic deficiency has taken apart this war propaganda root and branch.  Arash Norouzi's <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NOR20070120&articleId=4527">prima facie case</a> against what "everyone knows President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said" stands until it is rebutted.  <br />
<br />
The time to expose Bush's next phoney casus belli, and <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts192.html">impeach the war criminal</a>, is <i><b>NOW</b></i>.  <br />
<br />
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1162484349.shtml">
<title>Can't See the Bloody Forest for the Twigs</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1162484349.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Anthony Flood</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-11-02T16:11+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
The folks over at <a href="http://www.iraqbodycount.org/">Iraq Body Count</a> (IBC) dismiss the much-publicized <i>Lancet </i>estimates of Iraqi civilian deaths since March 2003, which put that figure at 650,000, give or take 300,000.  IBC defends their estimation of a much smaller range of noncombatant deaths, but one that nevertheless should disturb every American.  <br />
<br />
It should especially haunt those who, currently lusting after power in the District of Corruption, parrot the party line that the only problem with the war is how it has been “handled” and not whether it should have been undertaken in the first place.  But it probably won’t.  <br />
<br />
IBC’s more realistic estimate should, of course, give no comfort whatsoever to the knaves who currently occupy that District’s den of iniquity.  But it probably does.<br />
<br />
They estimate, for reasons presented in <a href="http://www.iraqbodycount.org/editorial/defended/">“Speculation Is No Substitute,”</a> that between 45,000 and 50,000 Iraqi noncombatants have lost their lives as a result of the war that the U.S.-led coalition instigated three years ago.  <br />
<br />
Not all Iraqi noncombatants, of course, have died as a direct consequence of U.S. and allied military action.  Many have been murdered, and are now being murdered at a rate of 40 a day, by rival Sunni and Shi’ite militia.  But the removal of Saddam Hussein’s monopoly on the means of coercion catalyzed the creation of those gangs, and for that removal we have coercive monopoly headquartered in DC to thank.  <br />
<br />
Without downplaying the cruelty of Saddam’s autocracy, we assume that almost all of those 45,000 to 50,000 human beings would be alive today were his gang still running the show in Baghdad.  But to those men, women, and children—each of whom no doubt valued his or her life, such as it was—the Bush-Cheney gang imperially announced, in effect: <br />
<blockquote><br />
<b>“You are better off dead (or wounded) under a ‘Saddam-free Iraq’ than alive (or whole) under Saddam.”</b></blockquote><br />
I invite criticism of that interpretation of U.S. Iraq policy.  I also invite a defense of the notion that a person can be morally entitled to such a preference and then to enforce it.  I fully expect variations on the theme that there is no exercise in depravity that the condition of war cannot excuse.<br />
<br />
Let’s extrapolate IBC’s estimated range into an American context.  The ballpark <a href="https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/iz.html">population figures</a> are: U.S. 300,000,000; Iraq, 26,000,000   That is, the U.S. population is roughly 11.5 times that of Iraq.  <br />
<br />
<b>Proportionally, therefore, an Iraqi noncombatant war-related death toll-range of 45,000-50,000 translates in U.S. terms to a range of from 517,757 to 575,285 noncombatants.  </b><br />
<br />
Consider that <a href="http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004615.html">U.S. World War II battle deaths</a> (all theaters) totaled 291,557.  Adding 113,842 “other deaths in service” yields 405,399.  A U.S. <i>civilian </i>death toll of Iraqi proportions would therefore be 20% greater than U.S. <i>military </i>deaths during World War II.  <br />
<br />
Or to bring things into the 21st century, consider that the civilian deaths resulting from the attacks on 9/11 number just under 3,000.  Adjusting proportionately to a civilian body count that Iraqis have experienced, Americans would have to suffer between 172 and 191 days like 9/11.<br />
<br />
But let us return to the urgent national debate over how the war in Iraq was “handled.”  Perhaps we can then rationalize the re-empowerment of those who proudly wear the mantle of the gloriously idealistic Kennedy-Johnson Great Society “liberalism” that instigated the extinguishing, by machine-gun, bomb, and napalm, the lives of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War">between two and four million Vietnamese noncombatants</a>.<br />
<br />
<b><i>". . .  killing the innocent, even if you know as a matter of statistical certainty that the things you do involve it, is not necessarily murder. . . . On the other hand, unscrupulousness in considering the possibilities turns it into murder.” G. E. M. Anscombe, <a href="http://www.anthonyflood.com/anscombetrumansdegree.htm">“Mr. Truman’s Degree”</a> </i></b><br />
<br />
<br />
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1155140667.shtml">
<title>In Honor of the Victims of American State-Sponsored Terror 61 Years Ago</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1155140667.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Anthony Flood</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-08-09T16:08+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
<b>The full text of the original 1956 pamphlet by G. E. M. Anscombe, <a href="http://www.anthonyflood.com/anscombetrumansdegree.htm">"Mr. Truman's Degree,"</a> is now available online for the first time.</b><br />
<br />
<center><i>"For men to choose to kill the innocent as a means to their ends is always murder . . ." </i></center><br />
<br />
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153690262.shtml">
<title>Buchanan: "It's Your War, Bill Kristol"</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153690262.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Anthony Flood</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-07-23T21:07+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
<b>No, This Is Not "Our War"<br />
Patrick J. Buchanan<br />
July 21, 2006 <br />
<a href="http://www.antiwar.com/pat/?articleid=9375">Antiwar.com</a> </b><br />
<br />
My country has been "torn to shreds," said Fouad Siniora, the prime minister of Lebanon, as the death toll among his people passed 300 civilian dead, 1,000 wounded, with half a million homeless.<br />
 <br />
Israel must pay for the "barbaric destruction," said Siniora.<br />
 <br />
To the contrary, says columnist Lawrence Kudlow, "Israel is doing the Lord's work."<br />
<br />
On American TV, former Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu says the ruination of Lebanon is Hezbollah's doing. But is it Hezbollah that is using U.S.-built F-16s, with precision-guided bombs, and 155-mm artillery pieces to wreak death and devastation on Lebanon?<br />
<br />
<center><a href="/files/anthonyflood-Bush_with_Israeli_flag.jpg"><img src="/files/anthonyflood-Bush_with_Israeli_flag-small.jpg" width="220" height="274"  alt=""></a></center> <br />
No, Israel is doing this, with the blessing and without a peep of protest from President Bush. And we wonder why they hate us.<br />
 <br />
<div class="trigger" id="shepzxa450.2c">(<a href="#" onClick="document.getElementById('hepzxa450.2c').style.display = 'block'; document.getElementById('shepzxa450.2c').style.display = 'none'; return false;">show</a>)</div><br />
<div class="hidden" style="display: none;" id="hepzxa450.2c"><br />
"Today, we are all Israelis!" brayed Ken Mehlman of the Republican National Committee to a gathering of Christians United for Israel.<br />
 <br />
One wonders if these Christians care about what is happening to our Christian brethren in Lebanon and Gaza, who have had all power cut off by Israeli air strikes, an outlawed form of collective punishment, that has left them with no sanitation, rotting food, impure water, and days without light or electricity in the horrible heat of July.<br />
 <br />
When summer power outrages occur in America, it means a rising rate of death among our sick and elderly, and women and infants. One can only imagine what a hell it must be today in Gaza City and Beirut.<br />
 <br />
But all this carnage and destruction has only piqued the blood lust of the hairy-chested warriors at <i>The Weekly Standard</i>. In a signed editorial, "It's Our War," William Kristol calls for America to play her rightful role in this war by "countering this act of aggression by Iran with a military strike against Iranian nuclear facilities. Why wait?"<br />
 <br />
"Why wait?" Well, one reason is that the United States has not been attacked. A second is  a small thing called the Constitution. Where does George W. Bush get the authority to launch a war on Iran? When did Congress declare war or authorize a war on Iran?<br />
 <br />
Answer: It never did. But these neoconservatives care no more about the Constitution than they cared about the truth when they lied us into war in Iraq.<br />
 <br />
"Why wait?" How about thinking of the fate of those 25,000 Americans in Lebanon if we launch an unprovoked war on Iran? How many would wind up dead or hostages of Hezbollah, if Iran gave the order to retaliate for the slaughter of their citizens by U.S. bombs? What would happen to the 130,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, if Shi'ites and Iranian "volunteers" joined forces to exact revenge on our soldiers?<br />
 <br />
What about America? Richard Armitage, who did four tours in Nam and knows a bit about war, says that, in its ability to attack Western targets, al-Qaeda is the B team, Hezbollah the A Team. If Bush bombs Iran, what prevents Hezbollah from launching  retaliatory attacks inside the United States?<br />
 <br />
None of this is written in defense of Hamas, Hezbollah, or Iran.<br />
 <br />
But none of them has attacked our country, nor has Syria, whom Bush I made an ally in the Gulf War, and to whom the most decorated soldier in Israeli history, Ehud Barak, offered 99 percent of the Golan Heights. If Nixon, Bush I, and Clinton could deal with Hafez al-Assad, a tougher customer than son Bashar, what is the matter with George W. Bush?<br />
 <br />
The last superpower is impotent in this war because we have allowed Israel to dictate to whom we may and may not talk. Thus, Bush winds up cussing in frustration in St. Petersburg that somebody should tell the Syrians to stop it. Why not pick up the phone, Mr. President?<br />
 <br />
What is Kristol's moral and legal ground for a war on Iran? It is the "Iranian act of aggression" against Israel, and that Iran is on the road to nuclear weapons, and we can't have that.<br />
 <br />
But there is no evidence Iran has any tighter  control over Hezbollah than we have over Israel, whose response to the capture of two soldiers had all the spontaneity of the Schlieffen Plan. And, again, Hezbollah attacked Israel, not <br />
us. And there is no solid proof Iran is in violation of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty, which it has signed but Israel refuses to sign.<br />
 <br />
If Iran's nuclear program justifies war, why cannot the neocons make that case in the constitutional way, instead of prodding Bush to launch a Pearl Harbor attack? Do they fear they have no credibility left after pushing Bush into this bloody quagmire in Iraq that has cost almost 2,600 dead and 18,000 wounded Americans?<br />
 <br />
No, Kenny boy, we are not "all Israelis." Some of us still think of ourselves as Americans, first, last, and always. And, no, Mr. Kristol, this is not "our war." It's your war.<br />
<br />
<div class="trigger">(<a href="#" onClick="document.getElementById('shepzxa450.2c').style.display = 'block';document.getElementById('hepzxa450.2c').style.display = 'none'; return false;">hide</a>)</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153689565.shtml">
<title>Roberts: We Will Reap What We’ve Sown</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153689565.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Anthony Flood</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-07-23T21:07+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
This week, following the Senate’s similarly inspired voice vote, Israel's cheerleaders in the House voted 410-8 to declare solidarity with Israel's disproportionate response to Hizbullah's inciting incident (which, in an ironic borrowing of leftist lingo, our "republican" caesar called "the root cause" of the current fighting).  <br />
<br />
Thanks for putting targets on all our backs, you Zionist glove-puppets!  Once again, you’ve made <a href="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1151341229.shtml">Mearsheimer and Walt</a> prophets with honor. <br />
<br />
“Indeed, Israel,” Roberts writes in his courageous column posted below, “which has one of the world’s largest per capita incomes, is the largest recipient of US foreign aid.  Many believe that much of this ‘aid’ comes back to AIPAC, which uses it to elect ‘our’ representatives in Congress.”  <br />
<br />
The rest comes back to “buy” weapons from the Pentagon, including bombs which, according Saturday’s <i>Times</i>, are being rushed to Israel.  (The article is reproduced after Roberts' column below.)<br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://www.counterpunch.org">The Shame of Being An American</a><br />
Paul Craig Roberts</b><br />
<br />
Do you know that Israel is engaged in ethnic cleansing in southern Lebanon?  <br />
<br />
Israel has ordered all the villagers to clear out.  Israel then destroys their homes and murders the fleeing villagers.  <br />
<br />
That way there is no one to come back and nothing to which to return, making it easier for Israel to grab the territory, just as Israel has been stealing Palestine from the Palestinians.<br />
<br />
Do you know that one-third of the Lebanese civilians murdered by Israel’s attacks on civilian residential districts are children?  <br />
<br />
That is the report from Jan Egeland, the emergency relief coordinator for the UN.  He says it is impossible for help to reach the wounded and those buried in rubble, because Israeli air strikes have blown up all the bridges and roads.  <br />
<br />
Considering how often (almost always) Israel misses Hizbollah targets and hits civilian ones, one might think that Israeli fire is being guided by US satellites and US military GPS.  <br />
<br />
Don’t be surprised at US complicity.  Why would the puppet be any less evil than the puppet master?<br />
<br />
Of course, you don’t know these things, because the US print and TV media do not report them.<br />
<br />
<div class="trigger" id="shepzwvx4q.c4">(<a href="#" onClick="document.getElementById('hepzwvx4q.c4').style.display = 'block'; document.getElementById('shepzwvx4q.c4').style.display = 'none'; return false;">show</a>)</div><br />
<div class="hidden" style="display: none;" id="hepzwvx4q.c4"><br />
Because Bush is so proud of himself, you do know that he has blocked every effort to stop the Israeli slaughter of Lebanese civilians.  Bush has told the UN “NO.”  Bush has told the European Community “NO.”  Bush has told the pro-American Lebanese prime minister “NO.”  Twice.  Bush is very proud of his firmness.  He is enjoying Israel’s rampage and wishes he could do the same thing in Iraq.<br />
<br />
Does it make you a Proud American that “your” president gave Israel the green light to drop bombs on convoys of villagers fleeing from Israeli shelling, on residential neighborhoods in the capital of Beirut and throughout Lebanon, on hospitals, on power plants, on food production and storage, on ports, on civilian airports, on bridges, on roads, on every piece of infrastructure on which civilized life depends?  Are you a Proud American?  Or are you an Israeli puppet?<br />
<br />
On July 20, “your” House of Representatives voted 410-8 in favor of Israel’s massive war crimes in Lebanon.  Not content with making every American complicit in war crimes, “your” House of Representatives, according to the Associated Press, also “condemns enemies of the Jewish state.”<br />
<br />
Who are the “enemies of the Jewish state”?<br />
<br />
They are the Palestinians whose land has been stolen by the Jewish state, whose homes and olive groves have been destroyed by the Jewish state, whose children have been shot down in the streets by the Jewish state, whose women have been abused by the Jewish state.  <br />
<br />
They are Palestinians who have been walled off into ghettos, who cannot reach their farm lands or medical care or schools, who cannot drive on roads through Palestine that have been constructed for Israelis only.  <br />
<br />
They are Palestinians whose ancient towns have been invaded by militant Zionist “settlers” under the protection of the Israeli army who beat and persecute the Palestinians and drive them out of their towns.  <br />
<br />
They are Palestinians who cannot allow their children outside their homes because they will be murdered by Israeli “settlers.”<br />
<br />
The Palestinians who confront Israeli evil are called “terrorists.”  When Bush forced free elections on Palestine, the people voted for Hamas.  Hamas is the organization that has stood up to the Jewish state.  This means, of course, that Hamas is evil, anti-semitic, un-American and terrorist.  The US and Israel responded by cutting off all funds to the new government.  Democracy is permitted only if it produces the results Bush and Israel want.<br />
<br />
Israelis never practice terror.  Only those who are in Israel’s way are terrorists.<br />
<br />
Another enemy of the Jewish state is Hizbollah.  Hizbollah is a militia of Shia Muslims created  in 1982 when Israel first invaded Lebanon.  During this invasion the great moral Jewish state arranged for the murder of refugees in refugee camps.  The result of Israel’s atrocities was Hizbollah, which fought the Israeli army, defeated it, and drove it, with its tail between its legs, out of Lebanon.  Today Hizbollah not only defends southern Lebanon but also provides social services such as orphanages and medical care.<br />
<br />
To cut to the chase, the enemies of the Jewish state are any Muslim country not ruled by an American puppet friendly to Israel.  Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the oil emirates have sided with Israel against their own kind, because they are dependent either on American money or on American protection from their own people.  Sooner or later these totally corrupt governments that do not represent the people they rule will be overthrown.  It is only a matter of time.<br />
<br />
Indeed Bush and Israel may be hastening the process in their frantic effort to overthrow the governments of Syria and Iran.  Both governments have more popular support than Bush has, but the White House Moron doesn’t know this.  The Moron thinks Syria and Iran will be “cakewalks” like Iraq, where ten proud divisions of the US military are tied down by a few lightly armed insurgents.<br />
<br />
If you are still a Proud American, consider that your pride is doing nothing good for Israel or for America.<br />
<br />
On July 20 when “your” House of Representatives, following “your” US Senate, passed the resolution in support of Israel’s war crimes, the most powerful lobby in Washington, the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), quickly got out a press release proclaiming “The American people overwhelming support Israel’s war on terrorism and understand that we must stand by our closest ally in this time of crisis.”<br />
<br />
The truth is that Israel created the crisis by invading a country with a pro-American government.  The truth is that the American people do not support Israel’s war crimes, as the CNN quick poll results make clear and as was made clear by callers into C-Span.<br />
<br />
Despite the Israeli spin on news provided by US “reporting,” a majority of Americans do not approve of Israeli atrocities against Lebanese civilians.  Hizbollah is located in southern Lebanon.  If Israel is targeting Hizbollah, why are Israeli bombs falling on northern Lebanon?  Why are they falling on Beirut?  Why are they falling on civilian airports?  On schools and hospitals?<br />
<br />
Now we arrive at the main point.  When the US Senate and House of Representatives pass resolutions in support of Israeli war crimes and condemn those who resist Israeli aggression, the Senate and House confirm Osama bin Laden’s propaganda that America stands with Israel against the Arab and Muslim world.<br />
<br />
Indeed, Israel, which has one of the world’s largest per capita incomes, is the largest recipient of US foreign aid.  Many believe that much of this “aid” comes back to AIPAC, which uses it to elect “our” representatives in Congress.<br />
<br />
This perception is no favor to Israel, whose population is declining, as the smart ones have seen the writing on the wall and have been leaving. Israel is surrounded by hundreds of millions of Muslims who are being turned into enemies of Israel by Israel’s actions and inhumane policies.<br />
<br />
The hope in the Muslim world has always been that the United States would intervene in behalf of compromise and make Israel realize that Israel cannot steal Palestine and turn every Palestinian into a refugee.<br />
<br />
This has been the hope of the Arab world.  This is the reason our puppets have not been overthrown.  This hope is the reason America still had some prestige in the Arab world.<br />
<br />
The House of Representatives resolution, bought and paid for by AIPAC money, is the final nail in the coffin of American prestige in the Middle East.  It shows that America is, indeed, Israel’s puppet, just as Osama bin Laden says, and as a majority of Muslims believe.<br />
<br />
With hope and diplomacy dead, henceforth America and Israel have only tooth and claw.  The vaunted Israeli army could not defeat a rag tag militia in southern Lebanon.  The vaunted US military cannot defeat a rag tag, lightly armed, insurgency drawn from a minority of the population in Iraq, insurgents, moreover, who are mainly engaged in civil war against the Shia majority.<br />
<br />
What will the US and its puppet master do?  Both are too full of hubris and paranoia to admit their terrible mistakes.  Israel and the US will either destroy from the air the civilian infrastructure of Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, and Iran so that civilized life becomes impossible for Muslims, or the US and Israel will use nuclear weapons to intimidate Muslims into acquiescence to Israel’s desires.<br />
<br />
Muslim genocide in one form or another is the professed goal of the neoconservatives who have total control over the Bush administration. Neocon godfather Norman Podhoretz has called for World War IV (in neocon thinking WW III was the cold war) to overthrow Islam in the Middle East, deracinate the Islamic religion and turn it into a formalized, secular ritual.<br />
<br />
Rumsfeld’s neocon Pentagon has drafted new US war doctrine that permits pre-emptive nuclear attack on non-nuclear states.<br />
<br />
Neocon David Horowitz says that by slaughtering Palestinian and Lebanese civilians, “Israel is doing the work of the rest of the civilized world,” thus equating war criminals with civilized men.<br />
<br />
Neocon Larry Kudlow says that “Israel is doing the Lord’s work” by murdering Lebanese, a claim that should give pause to Israel’s Christian evangelical supporters.  Where does the Lord Jesus say, “go forth and murder your neighbors so that you may steal their lands”?<br />
<br />
The complicity of the American public in these heinous crimes will damn America for all time in history.<br />
<br />
<b>Paul Craig Roberts, coauthor of <i>The Tyranny of Good Intentions</i>, was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration.</b><br />
<br />
<br />
<b>New York Times<br />
July 22, 2006<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/22/world/middleeast/22military.html">U.S. Speeds Up Bomb Delivery for the Israelis</a> </b><br />
<br />
<b>By DAVID S. CLOUD and HELENE COOPER</b><br />
<br />
WASHINGTON, July 21 — The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon, American officials said Friday.<br />
<br />
The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said. Its disclosure threatens to anger Arab governments and others because of the appearance that the United States is actively aiding the Israeli bombing campaign in a way that could be compared to Iran’s efforts to arm and resupply Hezbollah.<br />
<br />
The munitions that the United States is sending to Israel are part of a multimillion-dollar arms sale package approved last year that Israel is able to draw on as needed, the officials said. But Israel’s request for expedited delivery of the satellite and laser-guided bombs was described as unusual by some military officers, and as an indication that Israel still had a long list of targets in Lebanon to strike. <br />
<br />
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Friday that she would head to Israel on Sunday at the beginning of a round of Middle Eastern diplomacy. The original plan was to include a stop to Cairo in her travels, but she did not announce any stops in Arab capitals. <br />
<br />
Instead, the meeting of Arab and European envoys planned for Cairo will take place in Italy, Western diplomats said. While Arab governments initially criticized Hezbollah for starting the fight with Israel in Lebanon, discontent is rising in Arab countries over the number of civilian casualties in Lebanon, and the governments have become wary of playing host to Ms. Rice until a cease-fire package is put together. <br />
<br />
To hold the meetings in an Arab capital before a diplomatic solution is reached, said Martin S. Indyk, a former American ambassador to Israel, “would have identified the Arabs as the primary partner of the United States in this project at a time where Hezbollah is accusing the Arab leaders of providing cover for the continuation of Israel’s military operation.” <br />
<br />
The decision to stay away from Arab countries for now is a markedly different strategy from the shuttle diplomacy that previous administrations used to mediate in the Middle East. “I have no interest in diplomacy for the sake of returning Lebanon and Israel to the status quo ante,” Ms. Rice said Friday. “I could have gotten on a plane and rushed over and started shuttling around, and it wouldn’t have been clear what I was shuttling to do.”<br />
<br />
Before Ms. Rice heads to Israel on Sunday, she will join President Bush at the White House for discussions on the Middle East crisis with two Saudi envoys, Saud al-Faisal, the foreign minister, and Prince Bandar bin Sultan, the secretary general of the National Security Council.<br />
<br />
The new American arms shipment to Israel has not been announced publicly, and the officials who described the administration’s decision to rush the munitions to Israel would discuss it only after being promised anonymity. The officials included employees of two government agencies, and one described the shipment as just one example of a broad array of armaments that the United States has long provided Israel.<br />
<br />
One American official said the shipment should not be compared to the kind of an “emergency resupply” of dwindling Israeli stockpiles that was provided during the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, when an American military airlift helped Israel recover from early Arab victories.<br />
<br />
David Siegel, a spokesman for the Israeli Embassy in Washington, said: “We have been using precision-guided munitions in order to neutralize the military capabilities of Hezbollah and to minimize harm to civilians. As a rule, however, we do not comment on Israel’s defense acquisitions.”<br />
<br />
Israel’s need for precision munitions is driven in part by its strategy in Lebanon, which includes destroying hardened underground bunkers where Hezbollah leaders are said to have taken refuge, as well as missile sites and other targets that would be hard to hit without laser and satellite-guided bombs.<br />
<br />
Pentagon and military officials declined to describe in detail the size and contents of the shipment to Israel, and they would not say whether the munitions were being shipped by cargo aircraft or some other means. But an arms-sale package approved last year provides authority for Israel to purchase from the United States as many as 100 GBU-28’s, which are 5,000-pound laser-guided bombs intended to destroy concrete bunkers. The package also provides for selling satellite-guided munitions.<br />
<br />
An announcement in 2005 that Israel was eligible to buy the “bunker buster” weapons described the GBU-28 as “a special weapon that was developed for penetrating hardened command centers located deep underground.” The document added, “The Israeli Air Force will use these GBU-28’s on their F-15 aircraft.”<br />
<br />
American officials said that once a weapons purchase is approved, it is up to the buyer nation to set up a timetable. But one American official said normal procedures usually do not include rushing deliveries within days of a request. That was done because Israel is a close ally in the midst of hostilities, the official said.<br />
<br />
Although Israel had some precision guided bombs in its stockpile when the campaign in Lebanon began, the Israelis may not have taken delivery of all the weapons they were entitled to under the 2005 sale. <br />
<br />
Israel said its air force had dropped 23 tons of explosives Wednesday night alone in Beirut, in an effort to penetrate what was believed to be a bunker used by senior Hezbollah officials.<br />
<br />
A senior Israeli official said Friday that the attacks to date had degraded Hezbollah’s military strength by roughly half, but that the campaign could go on for two more weeks or longer. “We will stay heavily with the air campaign,” he said. “There’s no time limit. We will end when we achieve our goals.”<br />
<br />
The Bush administration announced Thursday a military equipment sale to Saudi Arabia, worth more than $6 billion, a move that may in part have been aimed at deflecting inevitable Arab government anger at the decision to supply Israel with munitions in the event that effort became public.<br />
<br />
On Friday, Bush administration officials laid out their plans for the diplomatic strategy that Ms. Rice will pursue. In Rome, the United States will try to hammer out a diplomatic package that will offer Lebanon incentives under the condition that a United Nations resolution, which calls for the disarming of Hezbollah, is implemented. <br />
<br />
Diplomats will also try to figure out the details around an eventual international peacekeeping force, and which countries will contribute to it. Germany and Russia have both indicated that they would be willing to contribute forces; Ms. Rice said the United States was unlikely to.<br />
<br />
Implicit in the eventual diplomatic package is a cease-fire. But a senior American official said it remained unclear whether, under such a plan, Hezbollah would be asked to retreat from southern Lebanon and commit to a cease-fire, or whether American diplomats might depend on Israel’s continued bombardment to make Hezbollah’s acquiescence irrelevant.<br />
<br />
Daniel Ayalon, Israel’s ambassador to Washington, said that Israel would not rule out an international force to police the borders of Lebanon and Syria and to patrol southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah has had a stronghold. But he said that Israel was first determined to take out Hezbollah’s command and control centers and weapons stockpiles.<br />
<br />
<i>Thom Shanker contributed reporting for this article. </i><br />
<div class="trigger">(<a href="#" onClick="document.getElementById('shepzwvx4q.c4').style.display = 'block';document.getElementById('hepzwvx4q.c4').style.display = 'none'; return false;">hide</a>)</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153688397.shtml">
<title>So Terrorists Are Freedom-Fighters If They Phone Ahead?</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1153688397.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Anthony Flood</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-07-23T20:07+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
According to Bibi Netanyahu, “freedom-fighters” are not terrorists if they have the courtesy to place a warning phone call before taking actions that are morally certain to result in the deaths of noncombatants.  When Menachem Begin’s Irgun planted IEDs in the King David Hotel in 1946, they knew innocents were going to be killed.  Yet Netayahu and his ilk brand as “terrorists” whoever attempts to deny Israelis the bounty Zionist terror won for them.<br />
<br />
Did U.N. Peace Mediator Folke Bernadotte’s wife get a phone call before the Yitzhak Shamir’s Stern Gang made her a widow?<br />
 <br />
<b><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,173-2277717,00.html">British anger at terror celebration</a></b><br />
<br />
By Ned Parker and Stephen Farrell<br />
<br />
AS ISRAEL wages war against Hezbollah “terrorists” in Lebanon, Britain has protested about the celebration by right-wing Israelis of a Jewish “act of terrorism” against British rule 60 years ago this week. <br />
<br />
The rightwingers, including Binyamin Netanyahu, the former Prime Minister, are commemorating the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the headquarters of British rule, that killed 92 people and helped to drive the British from Palestine. <br />
<br />
They have erected a plaque outside the restored building, and are holding a two-day seminar with speeches and a tour of the hotel by one of the Jewish resistance fighters involved in the attack.<br />
<div class="trigger" id="shepzwa56i.76">(<a href="#" onClick="document.getElementById('hepzwa56i.76').style.display = 'block'; document.getElementById('shepzwa56i.76').style.display = 'none'; return false;">show</a>)</div><br />
<div class="hidden" style="display: none;" id="hepzwa56i.76"><br />
<br />
Simon McDonald, the British Ambassador in Tel Aviv, and John Jenkins, the Consul-General in Jerusalem, have written to the municipality, stating: “We do not think that it is right for an act of terrorism, which led to the loss of many lives, to be commemorated.” <br />
<br />
In particular they demanded the removal of the plaque that pays tribute to the Irgun, the Jewish resistance branch headed by Menachem Begin, the future Prime Minister, which carried out the attack on July 22, 1946.<br />
<br />
The plaque presents as fact the Irgun’s claim that people died because the British ignored warning calls. “For reasons known only to the British, the hotel was not evacuated,” it states. <br />
<br />
Mr McDonald and Dr Jenkins denied that the British had been warned, adding that even if they had “this does not absolve those who planted the bomb from responsibility for the deaths”. On Monday city officials agreed to remove the language deemed offensive from the blue sign hanging on the hotel’s gates, though that had not been done shortly before it was unveiled last night. <br />
<br />
The controversy over the plaque and the two-day celebration of the bombing, sponsored by Irgun veterans and the right-wing Menachem Begin Heritage Centre, goes to the heart of the debate over the use of political violence in the Middle East. Yesterday Mr Netanyahu argued in a speech celebrating the attack that the Irgun were governed by morals, unlike fighters from groups such as Hamas. <br />
<br />
“It’s very important to make the distinction between terror groups and freedom fighters, and between terror action and legitimate military action,” he said. “Imagine that Hamas or Hezbollah would call the military headquarters in Tel Aviv and say, ‘We have placed a bomb and we are asking you to evacuate the area’.”<br />
<br />
But the view of the attack was very different in 1946 when The Times branded the Irgun “terrorists in disguise”. Decades later, Irgun veterans are unrepentant. Sarah Agassi, 80, remembers spying in the King David Hotel. <br />
<br />
She and a fellow agent posed as a couple. They danced tangos and waltzes, sipped whisky and wine while they cased out the hotel.<br />
<br />
On the day her brother and his fellow fighters posed as Arabs delivering milk and brought seven milk churns, each containing 50kg of explosives, into the building. Ms Agassi waited across the street until her brother rushed out. She said that she then made the warning call to the British command in the hotel.<br />
<br />
Sitting in the luxurious hotel lobby, she expressed no regret. “We fought for our independence. We thought it was the right way . . . If I had to fight for Israel, I swear even now I would do anything.”<br />
<div class="trigger">(<a href="#" onClick="document.getElementById('shepzwa56i.76').style.display = 'block';document.getElementById('hepzwa56i.76').style.display = 'none'; return false;">hide</a>)</div></div>]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1142700034.shtml">
<title>COMINTERN Mentality Revisited . . . in the District of Corruption</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1142700034.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Anthony Flood</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-03-18T16:03+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
Rothbardian international affairs analyst Justin Raimondo exposes the Bush Doctrine to be, ironically enough, "inside-out Bizarro World Trotskyism" in his latest editorial for Anti-War.com, <a href="http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8718">"American Megalomania."</a>  The following appetizer should lure you to the whole of which it is a part.<br />
<blockquote><br />
What the U.S. government is saying, here [in its National Security Strategy white paper], is that it has abandoned the traditional behavior of ordinary nation-states throughout history. This is generally understood to be the preservation and protection its own national interests, somewhat narrowly defined as the defense of its territory and such ancillary overseas interests as are directly related to its continued survival as a nation. But the Americans have now abandoned that paradigm, and are seemingly intent on adopting the old Soviet model, at least the one that predominated in the immediate aftermath of the 1917 Bolshevik coup, in which the Communist International was proclaimed from the rooftops and the leaders of the Russian state routinely referred to their intention to overthrow world capitalism.<br />
<br />
In the minds of its leaders, the Soviet state apparatus was not merely concerned with governing Russia and the captive nations, but was a kind of General Command of the world proletariat, tasked just as much with spreading Commie rule over the rest of the globe as it was in filling the potholes in the streets of Leningrad. In this sense, the Russian commissars were carriers of an ideological cancer, one that insisted on metastasizing until it – finally – collapsed, exhausted by its exertions and inner contradictions. The USSR was, in principle if not always in effect, a "rogue" state, one explicitly committed to fomenting conflict.<br />
<br />
Similarly, the Bush administration, in reserving to itself the right to effect "regime change" anywhere and everywhere on earth, by any means necessary, has transformed itself into a "revolutionary" state, one that seeks to spread its own system over the entire earth – by consent of the "liberated," if possible, by force of arms if necessary. <br />
</blockquote><br />
Again, for the whole argument, go <a href="http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8718">here</a>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1138373608.shtml">
<title>Does Iranian President Ahmadinejad's remark have precedent?</title>
<link>http://anthonyflood.powerblogs.com/posts/1138373608.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Anthony Flood</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-01-27T14:01+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br />
I mean the one about <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9823624/">"wiping Israel off the map"</a>?<br />
<br />
Take a peek at the text of this 1941 book, <a href="http://www.codoh.com/germany/GERPERISH.HTML"><i>Germany Must Perish!</i></a>, whose demonic animus found embodiment in the vengeful Allied overlords, at whose hands more non-combatant Germans perished than there are Israelis today:<br />
<br />
Here's one of the book's charming illustrations:<br />
<br />
<center><a href="/files/anthonyflood-Germany_Must_Perish_map.1.gif"><img src="/files/anthonyflood-Germany_Must_Perish_map.1-small.gif" width="220" height="143"  alt=""></a></center><br />
<br />
Theodore Kaufman may not have been President of the United States, but people who thought like Kaufman included FDR.<br />
<br />
<br />
]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>